https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #9 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Vladimir Terzi from comment #8)
> I initially changed the status, because I assumed that my questions in
> comment #2 will be ignored.
>
> (In reply to kargls from comment #6)
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Terzi ---
I initially changed the status, because I assumed that my questions in comment
#2 will be ignored.
(In reply to kargls from comment #6)
> I suppose it is somewhat naive of gfortran contributors to expect t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #6 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Vladimir Terzi from comment #5)
> After a fruitful discussion in Stack Overflow, I understand that the model
> set of integers in Fortran is symmetric about zero according to the form
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Terzi ---
After a fruitful discussion in Stack Overflow, I understand that the model set
of integers in Fortran is symmetric about zero according to the formula in
section 16.4 of https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/24/2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
Vladimir Terzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Terzi ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> No gfortran is correct this code is invalid without an extra option.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 33285 ***
So you are implying that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
