https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66a41a0a9626a9b2f8de3cdb6ba82561b50cd9e8
commit r15-9182-g66a41a0a9626a9b2f8de3cdb6ba82561b50cd9e8
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> Unfortunately, we don't have a fallback on Darwin other than to use the
> original 'random()' and friends.
There's always the C++ .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonsobisch at gnu dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Does COBOL even have threads...?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|iains at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 60775
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60775&action=edit
Patch tested on x86_64 Darwin and Linux
Unfortunately, we don't have a fallback on Darwin other than to use the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
