https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119295

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> Unfortunately, we don't have a fallback on Darwin other than to use the
> original 'random()' and friends.

There's always the C++ <random>.

Reply via email to