https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #7 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Igor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
--- Comment #3 from Igor 2011-01-01 13:16:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Not a bug. The function parameters are of type "pointer to array[4] of const
> double" because const on an array type applies to the element type,
> recursively, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Igor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Igor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal