http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
--- Comment #3 from Igor <rogi at linuxmail dot org> 2011-01-01 13:16:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Not a bug. The function parameters are of type "pointer to array[4] of const > double" because const on an array type applies to the element type, > recursively, and then the outermost array type, only, of a parameter of array > type decays to a pointer, and the arguments passed are of type "pointer to > array[4] of double" after array-to-pointer decay, and the only case where > qualifiers are permitted to be added in assignment, argument passing etc. is > qualifiers on the immediate pointer target, not those nested more deeply. This was somewhat confusing to me. Did you mean that funcion expects: pointer to array[4] of const doubles and I am passing pointer to const array[4] of doubles instead? This really seems pretty much teh same to me. Correct me if I'm wrong please.
