--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-11
13:29 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > the warning is not the FSF's gcc, you two should have filed it with Redhat
> > instead.
>
> You're right: Current gcc CVS ("gcc version 4.0.0 20050211 (experimental)")
> doe
--- Additional Comments From bruno at clisp dot org 2005-02-11 13:13
---
> the warning is not the FSF's gcc, you two should have filed it with Redhat
> instead.
You're right: Current gcc CVS ("gcc version 4.0.0 20050211 (experimental)")
doesn't
show the warning. So it appears to be
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10
23:07 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is not duplicate of PR 14236, but rather a complaint about the
> implementation of the fix
> of PR 14236.
Well considering the warning is not the FSF's gcc, you two should
--- Additional Comments From bruno at clisp dot org 2005-02-10 21:43
---
The warning is not correct because
1) The code snippet uses alloca() and variable-size arrays for their
respective purpose:
alloca() for storage that persists until the end of the function, and
variable-s
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10
20:53 ---
The warning is not in the FSF's gcc at all.
Also the warning is correct see PR 14236 which I am going to mark this as a dup
of.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14236 ***
*** This bug has be
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19881
