https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Lesser ---
Nice, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
[basic.scope.class] p2:
"A name N used in a class S shall refer to the same declaration in its context
and when re-evaluated in the completed scope of S. No diagnostic is required
for a violation of this rul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Nicolas Lesser from comment #2)
> Huh, interesting. TIL. Where's that rule in the standard? Because I can't
> find it in [class.mem]. Is it somewhere else or did I just overlook it?
C++98 paragr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Lesser ---
Huh, interesting. TIL. Where's that rule in the standard? Because I can't find
it in [class.mem]. Is it somewhere else or did I just overlook it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
