https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Lesser from comment #2)
> Huh, interesting. TIL. Where's that rule in the standard? Because I can't
> find it in [class.mem]. Is it somewhere else or did I just overlook it?
C++98 paragraph numbers:
See 3.3.6/1
[...]
2) A name N used in a class S shall refer to the same declaration
in its context and when reevaluated in the completed scope of
S. No diagnostic is required for a violation of this rule.
I think that is the same as [basic.scope.class].
