https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
FWIW, the snippet from comment #1 builds fine with GCC >= 9.1 at least.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> Do I understand that correctly Jonathan that it's an issue in GCC? Or is it
> an invalid code snippet?
This is a GCC bug. The code should be accepted without a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> I can confirm that the PR is blocking Chromium build in openSUSE.
>From a Chromium perspective (where I'm coming from), it shouldn't be. The
problematic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
I can confirm that the PR is blocking Chromium build in openSUSE.
Do I understand that correctly Jonathan that it's an issue in GCC? Or is it an
invalid code snippet?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #7)
> Is it relevant that your testcase builds fine when G's copy constructor is
> inlined?
Yes, it seems to be. The checks done for the out-of-class default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Your example is not valid, and is rejected by GCC and Clang and EDG.
Ugh, I forgot to test it with clang before posting my comment. I stand
corrected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #5)
> Sorry if my comment was too coarse-grained. My hypothesis that this is a
> duplicate comes from playback_image_provider.ii looking like Chromium's
> pla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
Sorry if my comment was too coarse-grained. My hypothesis that this is a
duplicate comes from playback_image_provider.ii looking like Chromium's
playback_image_provider.cc, which was failing to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
They don't look like duplicates to me. PR 70431 involves a union, no SFINAE,
and a completely different error message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raphael.kubo.da.costa@intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slight correction: the using-declaration doesn't have no effect in general, but
it shouldn't change the result of this program.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
13 matches
Mail list logo
