https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It was fixed by:
PR c++/89381 - implicit copy and using-declaration.
Here the used base<int>::operator= gets into the list of foo's bindings for
operator=, but it shouldn't make the copy ctor deleted.
* class.c (classtype_has_move_assign_or_move_ctor_p): Don't
consider
op= brought in by a using-declaration.
From-SVN: r269442
Looks like a dup of PR c++/89381.
That fix has also been backported for GCC 8.4
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89381 ***
