http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49692
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-10
04:28:04 UTC ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49692
--- Comment #2 from John Kortink 2011-07-09
23:08:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Redundant parens are always possible.
They shouldn't always be possible. It is a laxity in the grammar that
needlessly causes context dependencies. And, in t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49692
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|