http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49692
--- Comment #2 from John Kortink <kortink at inter dot nl.net> 2011-07-09 23:08:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Redundant parens are always possible. They shouldn't always be possible. It is a laxity in the grammar that needlessly causes context dependencies. And, in this case, rejection of a perfectly valid language construct. Even if the context dependency is not removed, the interpretation of 'classname (variablename)' as a constructor call should be considered by the parser.
