[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2011-03-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2011-01-27 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Jason Merril

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2011-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2010-07-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 20:45 --- Subject: Bug 44909 Author: jason Date: Thu Jul 15 20:45:35 2010 New Revision: 162233 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162233 Log: PR c++/44909 * call.c (add_function_candidate): I

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2010-07-14 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-14 14:45 --- I can also confirm that r162158 accepted zut.cc and r162159 doesn't. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2010-07-14 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-14 14:30 --- I can confirm the new testcase doesn't compile anymore. Let's re-open this PR to be safe. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2010-07-14 Thread marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
--- Comment #4 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-07-14 14:14 --- The patch (or another one committed recently) seems to have broken the attached testcase (as you can see from the names, this comes from the same code), including in C++98 mode. If it is unrelated, sorry for

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2010-07-14 Thread marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
--- Comment #3 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-07-14 14:08 --- Created an attachment (id=21199) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21199&action=view) extra testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2010-07-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-14 00:01 --- Fixed. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2010-07-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 22:24 --- Subject: Bug 44909 Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 13 22:23:49 2010 New Revision: 162159 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162159 Log: PR c++/44909 * cp-tree.h (struct lang_type_class)