------- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-14 14:45 ------- I can also confirm that r162158 accepted zut.cc and r162159 doesn't.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909
[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:45:36 -0700
- [Bug c++/44909] New: Copy construct... marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
- [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy co... jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy co... jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy co... marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
- [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy co... marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
- [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy co... paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy co... paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy co... jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
