https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
--- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Ok, this is
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#1960
which says
"The rule was introduced because the hiding of a base class member by an
intermediate derived class is potentially int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
--- Comment #8 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #7)
> This is invalid. [namespace.udecl]/3 says that if the declaration names
> a constructor, the nested-name-specifier shall name a direct base, but if
> the de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|IN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
--- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eelis from comment #1)
> Still accepted by 4.4. Comeau concurs with reporter, and rejects saying:
>
> line 15: error: class member designated by a
> using-declaration must be vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
--- Comment #2 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #0)
> The problem should be that B::foo hides A::foo from class C. Clause 7.3.3/14
> of the C++ standard says the using declaration should not work, in this c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
12:00 ---
Still accepted by 4.4. Comeau concurs with reporter, and rejects saying:
line 15: error: class member designated by a
using-declaration must be visible in a direct base class
--
gcc-bugzilla a
12 matches
Mail list logo