[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2006-04-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 --- Subject: Bug 18803 Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006 New Revision: 113191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191 Log: 2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2006-04-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 --- Subject: Bug 18803 Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006 New Revision: 112981 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981 Log: 2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-17 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-17 20:53 --- Reverted patch for PR 18445, which broke this. Fixed on the 3.4 branch, thusly. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-17 20:49 --- Subject: Bug 18803 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-17 20:48:46 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-16 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-09-16 22:40 --- Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 16 Sep, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: | > IMHO reverti

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-16 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16 21:04 --- On 16 Sep, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > IMHO reverting 18445 would be the most prudent thing to do. The combination > of 18845+18803 are touching too many things for my liking. Gaby, would that

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16 20:57 --- IMHO reverting 18445 would be the most prudent thing to do. The combination of 18845+18803 are touching too many things for my liking. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18803

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-16 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16 20:34 --- The backport of the fix for PR 18445 caused this. I'll try to backport the fix for PR18803, too. If that fails, reverting the patch for PR 18445 seems like the right thing to me, because this was only an ic

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-15 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 11:36 --- I haven't backported anything recently. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nathan at g

[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template

2005-09-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.4.5 Known to work||3.4.4 Summary|[3.4.5 regression] rejects |[3