------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-09-16 22:40 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 16 Sep, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: | > IMHO reverting 18445 would be the most prudent thing to do. The combination | > of 18845+18803 are touching too many things for my liking. | | Gaby, would that be OK with you? Yes -- fixes for ice-on-invalid are nice to have but they are not critical, especially if their fixing introduces more potential for regression. | I'd revert the patch for PR 18445 on the 3.4 branch, add the testcase | for PR18803 to the 3.4 branch (bootstrapped and regtested, of course), | and close PR 18445 as fixed in 4.0.0 and WONTFIX in 3.4. Thanks! -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18803
