https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021
--- Comment #6 from Martin Uecker ---
Note that I do not propose to add variably modified types to C++. This would
indeed be a major extension. I simply propose to ignore the size expressions
in C headers as a usability improvement. My patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #4)
> Sorry, how can an enhancement request that addresses a real C/C++
> compatibility problem be marked "resolved invalid" ?
Because GCC does like these days to add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021
--- Comment #4 from Martin Uecker ---
Sorry, how can an enhancement request that addresses a real C/C++ compatibility
problem be marked "resolved invalid" ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 110920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021
--- Comment #2 from Martin Uecker ---
True. But we could still take it as a hint about where this is not useful to
users to diagnose this as an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
