https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #4) > Sorry, how can an enhancement request that addresses a real C/C++ > compatibility problem be marked "resolved invalid" ? Because GCC does like these days to add huge extensions to the C++ language. Maybe you could bring this up to WG21 (C++ standards committee) as a paper which fully thought out (and an implementation either GCC or clang as an open source example). GCC might take that implementation and have it as an extension ...
