https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105111
--- Comment #3 from Andrei-Edward Popa ---
Thanks for that reference to the standard, it is clear to me why gcc reject
this call as ambiguous.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105111
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
FWIW one workaround could be to consistently use 'T' or 'const T&' as the first
function parameter for both functions.
Another workaround could be to constrain the second overload with
'(!std::is_signed::va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105111
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
