https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105111
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrei-Edward Popa from comment #0)
> I think this is a bug because the most constrained constructor is the first
> one and has a matching requires clause when we create the s object.
According to the standard (http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.func.order#6), "more
constrained" is used as a tiebreaker between two functions only if their
(function and template) parameter lists are equivalent. In your example the
function parameter lists different ('T' vs 'const T&'), so I believe GCC is
correct to reject the call as ambiguous. If other compilers accept it, it's
probably because they don't implement wg21.link/p2113r0 (which changed this
part of the standard).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96333 ***
