--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-03
05:59 ---
Mark as invalid.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESO
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-03
05:58 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should this be revisited now that gcc-4.x has disallowed
> ternaries as lvalues? My users are somewhat mystified
> as to why they need to declare storage for integer
> constants w
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-08-03 05:53 ---
Should this be revisited now that gcc-4.x has disallowed
ternaries as lvalues? My users are somewhat mystified
as to why they need to declare storage for integer
constants whose address is never taken.
--
http://
