------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-03
05:58 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should this be revisited now that gcc-4.x has disallowed
> ternaries as lvalues? My users are somewhat mystified
> as to why they need to declare storage for integer
> constants whose address is never taken.
Because that is what the standard allows. Also if you turn on optimization,
the references go away.
Reopening to ...
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10483
