[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2014-01-03 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #44 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #43 from Hin-Tak Leung --- > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #40) >> Please try this on your system and tell us how you end up with >> bootstrap-deb

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2013-12-29 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #43 from Hin-Tak Leung --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #40) > Please try this on your system and tell us how you end up with > bootstrap-debug instead of none. Hmm, sorry, redherring. I think I found the di

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2013-12-29 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #42 from Hin-Tak Leung --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #40) > if GNU cmp is installed. compare-debug doesn't take this into account, > so if I manually run this code snippet from configure > > if echo

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2013-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2013-04-15 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #40 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-15 12:51:20 UTC --- > --- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-12 > 16:13:20 UTC --- > Can this be reproduced with 4.7.3, 4.8.0 or trunk? At most on the 4.7 branch: the T

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2013-04-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-14 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #38 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-09-14 14:43:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) > I've no idea why gmp 4.3.x or 5.x works for you: both fail make check > for me if built with gcc 4.4.2. I've not yet tried newer versions. probably sligh

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #37 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:54:42 UTC --- > --- Comment #32 from Hin-Tak Leung > 2012-09-01 11:22:55 UTC --- > Went back to 4.5.0 and commenting out '#STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle' in > config/bootstrap-debu

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:51:58 UTC --- > --- Comment #30 from Hin-Tak Leung > 2012-09-01 08:18:06 UTC --- > I commented out gcc-4.7.1/config/bootstrap-debug.mk : > > #STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle > > and

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:49:28 UTC --- > --- Comment #28 from Hin-Tak Leung > 2012-08-30 17:32:35 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #22) > >> > There are two curious things: >> > 1. why does the 2nd stage

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:44:22 UTC --- > --- Comment #27 from Hin-Tak Leung > 2012-08-30 14:56:46 UTC --- > FWIW, I just filed the MFPR 3.1.x "make check" issue: > > https://gforge.inria.fr/tracker/ind

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:42:44 UTC --- > --- Comment #26 from Hin-Tak Leung > 2012-08-30 14:19:16 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #22) > >> The sentence about newer versions is there for a reason. In

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-01 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #32 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-09-01 11:22:55 UTC --- Went back to 4.5.0 and commenting out '#STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle' in config/bootstrap-debug.mk have it going beyond stage2/3 comparison. So I don't know how I managed to build 4.6.1

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #31 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-01 08:26:32 UTC --- I don't think bootstrap-debug.mk cannot be used for alpha OSF. configure checks to see if it is possible: if echo "int f (void) { return 0; }" > conftest.c && ${CC} -c con

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-09-01 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #30 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-09-01 08:18:06 UTC --- I commented out gcc-4.7.1/config/bootstrap-debug.mk : #STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle and 4.7.1 passed. this seems likely the cause - -gtoogle was introduced in 4.5.x. I am going to try

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-08-31 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #29 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-09-01 02:53:00 UTC --- Created attachment 28115 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28115 sets of failed-to-compare objs from 4.7.1 tgz'ed, failed-to-compared obj's from 4.7.1 . stage2 alw

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-08-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #28 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-08-30 17:32:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > > There are two curious things: > > 1. why does the 2nd stage drops to only about 600 byte. (I assume 20-30k is > > normal). > > That's certainly complet

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-08-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #27 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-08-30 14:56:46 UTC --- FWIW, I just filed the MFPR 3.1.x "make check" issue: https://gforge.inria.fr/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=14806&group_id=136&atid=619

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-08-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #26 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-08-30 14:19:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > The sentence about newer versions is there for a reason. In fact, on > Tru64 UNIX the situation is even worse: gmp 4.3.2 make check fails for > me, so I'

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-08-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 Hin-Tak Leung changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27346|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2012-07-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING Target Milestone|4.5.4