--- Comment #5 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-03 12:55 ---
This has been fixed alreayd in SVN.
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:01 ---
Given that this happens when currently analyzing "Id" (and not "Prev"), posting
the error message on "Prev" instead of "Id" may be an historical typo
(inversion between both parameters in the call to Error_Msg_NE).
For
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:54 ---
OK, classifying as an enhancement request, since there's no bug here, the error
message is correct.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:43 ---
I expect the error message to point at the full declaration itself, not the
partial view, as the partial view had been analyzed correctly and had no error
so far. When it says "full declaration of type T declared at XXX"
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:34 ---
Well, I must be blind, but I do not see a bad location here: GNAT complains
at line 3 that the full declaration "defined at line 4" must be tagged,
showing indeed the line where type T is declared as tagged.
Looks c
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconf
