------- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:34 -------
Well, I must be blind, but I do not see a bad location here: GNAT complains
at line 3 that the full declaration "defined at line 4" must be tagged,
showing indeed the line where type T is declared as tagged.
Looks correct to me.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35886
