[Bug fortran/121139] gfortran rejects selector that is a type-bound function reference invoked on an associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121139 --- Comment #2 from Andre Vehreschild --- Oh, and it needs to be: use julienne_test_description_m implicit none associate(test_descriptions => [test_description_t()]) associate(substring_in_test_diagnosis => test_descriptions(1)%conta

[Bug fortran/121139] gfortran rejects selector that is a type-bound function reference invoked on an associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121139 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119106] Crash with character array constructor + implicit loop + data from `parameter` variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119106 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/119054] [13 Regression] ICE on passing optional array to elemental procedure with -pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119054 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Re

[Bug fortran/120637] Memory leak in finalization gfortran 9.5-16.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120637 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/120843] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/120843] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #11 from Andre

[Bug fortran/120847] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] ICE after "Component ... already declared at..." when type with coarray comp is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120847 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/120843] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/120637] Memory leak in finalization gfortran 9.5-16.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120637 --- Comment #9 from Andre Vehreschild --- This is candidate for a backport to at least gcc-15. I therefore wait a week to let it mature before backporting.

[Bug fortran/120889] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120889 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/120711] [15/16 regression] Growing arrays segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/120847] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] ICE after "Component ... already declared at..." when type with coarray comp is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120847 --- Comment #3 from Andre Vehreschild --- Will backport to gcc-15 in about a week.

[Bug fortran/120843] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 --- Comment #5 from Andre Vehreschild --- Waiting about on week for regressions to pop up before backporting to gcc-15.

[Bug fortran/120847] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] ICE after "Component ... already declared at..." when type with coarray comp is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120847 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/120843] [15/16-Regression, Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-30 Status|UNCON

[Bug fortran/120889] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120889 --- Comment #1 from Andre Vehreschild --- I'll have a look as soon as I finish the work for aarch64-freebsd.

[Bug fortran/120843] [Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/120847] [Coarray] ICE after "Component ... already declared at..." when type with coarray comp is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120847 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/120847] New: [Coarray] ICE after "Component ... already declared at..." when type with coarray comp is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120847 Bug ID: 120847 Summary: [Coarray] ICE after "Component ... already declared at..." when type with coarray comp is defined Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/120843] [Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/120843] New: [Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843 Bug ID: 120843 Summary: [Coarray] Inconsistent ranks for operator reported when coarray ranks differ Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug fortran/120637] Memory leak in finalization gfortran 9.5-16.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120637 --- Comment #6 from Andre Vehreschild --- Hi Antony, I could not apply your patch. Neither by git am nor by patch -p1. So I had to replay it essentially. With that applied all seems to be fine, executionwise. But the regression tests fail for f

[Bug fortran/120711] [15/16 regression] Growing arrays segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711 --- Comment #8 from Andre Vehreschild --- Planning to backport to gcc-15 in about a week, i.e. on July 3th. 2025. When it has not been backported by then, feel free to remind me or do the backport of dff66a690f6d47963e5cb96677d0e194b85948fa

[Bug fortran/88076] Shared Memory implementation for Coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076 --- Comment #22 from Andre Vehreschild --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #21) ... > Additional information with these patches. I see the following installation > with make install. > > :~/dev/usrav/lib/gcc$ ls x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/16.

[Bug fortran/120637] Memory leak in finalization gfortran 9.5-16.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120637 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Ever c

[Bug fortran/119106] Crash with character array constructor + implicit loop + data from `parameter` variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119106 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/120302] ICE in gfc_trans_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120302 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/120656] SEGV with a Function Returning a TYPE with ALLOCATABLE Component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120656 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/120711] [15/16 regression] Growing arrays segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/120711] [15/16 regression] Growing arrays segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gilbert.scott.99@googlemail

[Bug fortran/120711] [14/15/16 regression] Growing arrays segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711 --- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > Indeed. valgrind reports an invalid read with -fcoarray=none. > But I do not see this on 14-branch. You are right. One does not see the invalid read on gcc-14. B

[Bug fortran/120743] [16 regression] ice in verify_gimple_in_seq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120743 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/120711] [14/15/16 regression] Growing arrays segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15/16 regression] Growing |[14/15/16 regression]

[Bug fortran/120711] Growing arrays segfaults when compiling with -fcoarray=single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Ever c

[Bug fortran/88076] Shared Memory implementation for Coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/120483] [15 Regression] character(len=:), allocatable, save variable returns incorrect substring since r15-2131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120483 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/120483] [15 Regression] character(len=:), allocatable, save variable returns incorrect substring since r15-2131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120483 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Andre

[Bug fortran/120483] [15/16 Regression] character(len=:), allocatable, save variable returns incorrect substring since r15-2131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120483 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/120483] [15/16 Regression] character(len=:), allocatable, save variable returns incorrect substring since r15-2131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120483 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 87326, which changed state. Bug 87326 Summary: [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66681] [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 87939, which changed state. Bug 87939 Summary: [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 66681, which changed state. Bug 66681 Summary: [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 What|Removed |Add

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 103796, which changed state. Bug 103796 Summary: form-team-spec-list is unsupported https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/101348] [Coarray] ICE in gfc_get_nodesc_array_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:1697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101348 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Re

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-22 Status|UNCON

[Bug fortran/66681] [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/104826] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gimple_range_global, at value-query.cc:424 – with deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104826 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #11 from Andre

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #10 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14] Free of procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Free of procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 --- Comment #8 from Andre Vehreschild --- Waiting one week before backporting to gcc-14.

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassign

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassign

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassign

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Free of procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Summary|[12,13,1

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with allocatable and procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 --- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > Is the known-to-fail list correct? > I do not see failures for 11- and 12-releases. > > The dump tree also changes only between 12 and 13. > To me it looks rather

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #7 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with allocatable and procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-03-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 --- Comment #6 from Andre Vehreschild --- I mean pr90068

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 119272, which changed state. Bug 119272 Summary: Function misidentified as non-function in associate statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/119272] Function misidentified as non-function in associate statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/119272] Function misidentified as non-function in associate statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee|unassign

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98903 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98903 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/107143] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (Error: non-trivial conversion in 'mem_ref')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107143 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/98904] valgrind error in gfc_trans_assignment_1 during bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|WAITIN

[Bug fortran/119136] Printing result of function that prints itself hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119136 --- Comment #8 from Andre Vehreschild --- Jerry, may be you can use an atomic https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic . This way you don't need an expensive lock. My strategy would be to declare a global atomic bool value (e.g. in_output) and in each __

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98903 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98903 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   3   4   >