[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119200 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 87326, which changed state. Bug 87326 Summary: [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66681] [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 87939, which changed state. Bug 87939 Summary: [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 66681, which changed state. Bug 66681 Summary: [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 What|Removed |Add

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 103796, which changed state. Bug 103796 Summary: form-team-spec-list is unsupported https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/101348] [Coarray] ICE in gfc_get_nodesc_array_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:1697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101348 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119200] [coarray] valgrind error in gfc_format_decoder

|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/66681] [Coarray] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103001 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/104826] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gimple_range_global, at value-query.cc:424 – with deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104826 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #11 from Andre

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #10 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14] Free of procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Free of procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 --- Comment #8 from Andre Vehreschild --- Waiting one week before backporting to gcc-14.

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/88960] [F18] ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: add INITIAL_TEAM, PARENT_TEAM, and CURRENT_TEAM

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103796] form-team-spec-list is unsupported

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103001] missing simplify of (CAF) get_team

||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2025-03-24 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/97210] Intrinsic function get_team() does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97210 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements

||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87556] FORM TEAM statement team-number argument interpreted incorrectly when function

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Free of procedure pointer components

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Andre Vehreschild --- The bug has nothing to do with associate specifically, but will occur on regular assign, too. GFortran missed out on not freeing procedure pointer components. The patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with allocatable and procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 --- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > Is the known-to-fail list correct? > I do not see failures for 11- and 12-releases. > > The dump tree also changes only between 12 and 13. > To me it looks rather

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #7 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with allocatable and procedure pointer components

|1 CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 --- Comment #6 from Andre Vehreschild --- I mean pr90068

[Bug fortran/119349] [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 119272, which changed state. Bug 119272 Summary: Function misidentified as non-function in associate statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/119272] Function misidentified as non-function in associate statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/119272] Function misidentified as non-function in associate statement

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Andre Vehreschild --- Patch proposed at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-March/061910.html Awaiting review.

[Bug fortran/87326] [F18] Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98903 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98903 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/107143] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (Error: non-trivial conversion in 'mem_ref')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107143 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/98904] valgrind error in gfc_trans_assignment_1 during bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|WAITIN

[Bug fortran/119136] Printing result of function that prints itself hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119136 --- Comment #8 from Andre Vehreschild --- Jerry, may be you can use an atomic https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic . This way you don't need an expensive lock. My strategy would be to declare a global atomic bool value (e.g. in_output) and in each __

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98903 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/98903] [Coarray, F2018] Implement TEAM_NUMBER in image-selector-spec

|NEW Last reconfirmed||2025-03-06 CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99308] [OOP] passing array of object as class(TYPE) to procedure leads to incorrect length of array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99308 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/119136] New: Printing result of function that prints itself hangs

Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Reproducer: print *, foo_io() contains function foo_io() integer :: foo_io(2) print * , "foo" foo_io = [42, 42] end function end Han

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #12 from Andre Vehreschild --- This prints the correct results. Seems to be fixed, closing.

[Bug fortran/117730] Wrong code with non_overridable typebound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117730 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #11 from Andre

[Bug fortran/107143] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (Error: non-trivial conversion in 'mem_ref')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107143 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/107143] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (Error: non-trivial conversion in 'mem_ref')

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104684] [12/13/14/15 Regression] [coarray] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (Error: non-trivial conversion in 'component_ref') since r7-5771-gde91486c745d5ff6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104684 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/104684] [12/13/14/15 Regression] [coarray] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (Error: non-trivial conversion in 'component_ref') since r7-5771-gde91486c745d5ff6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104684 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #9 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/103391] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r7-4021-g574284e9c49687d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vehre at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104684] [12/13/14/15 Regression] [coarray] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (Error: non-trivial conversion in 'component_ref') since r7-5771-gde91486c745d5ff6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104684 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104130] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_class_array_ref, at fortran/class.c:274 since r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104130 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/77872] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_token, at fortran/trans-array.c:305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103391] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r7-4021-g574284e9c49687d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391 --- Comment #12 from Andre Vehreschild --- Mhhh, when one needs to know the "correct answer" to get it from an AI, what help is the AI then?

[Bug fortran/77872] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_token, at fortran/trans-array.c:305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #15 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/103391] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r7-4021-g574284e9c49687d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 118747, which changed state. Bug 118747 Summary: [15 Regression]: seg fault on accessing an elemental procedure dummy argument's deferred-length component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118747 Wh

[Bug fortran/118747] [15 Regression]: seg fault on accessing an elemental procedure dummy argument's deferred-length component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118747 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/118747] [15 Regression]: seg fault on accessing an elemental procedure dummy argument's deferred-length component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118747 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/118730] Final subroutine of derived type variable that is declared but not used is not called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118730 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118730] Final subroutine of derived type variable that is declared but not used is not called

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/118730] Final subroutine of derived type variable that is declared but not used is not called

|1 CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/118747] [15 Regression]: seg fault on accessing an elemental procedure dummy argument's deferred-length component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118747 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/118789] [15 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.cc:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118789 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/118796] [15 Regression] ICE when building atlas-ecmwf 0.40.0 (copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.cc:1109)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118796 Bug 118796 depends on bug 118789, which changed state. Bug 118789 Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.cc:229 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118789 What|Removed |A

[Bug fortran/118747] [15 Regression]: seg fault on accessing an elemental procedure dummy argument's deferred-length component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118747 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-26 Status|UNCON

[Bug fortran/118789] [15 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.cc:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118789 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108233] [Coarray] bcast to non-allocatable COMPLEX scalar coarray may generate wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108233 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/108233] [Coarray] bcast to non-allocatable COMPLEX scalar coarray may generate wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108233 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 107635, which changed state. Bug 107635 Summary: [Coarray] Allocatable components of types defined in module's interface are not handled correctly when used in coarrays. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107635

[Bug fortran/107635] [Coarray] Allocatable components of types defined in module's interface are not handled correctly when used in coarrays.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107635 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/108233] [Coarray] bcast to non-allocatable COMPLEX scalar coarray may generate wrong result

||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/114612] Deep copy missing for allocatable derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114612 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/116669] compiler crash on circular derived type component definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116669 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/57598] [Coarray, caf] Add FPE summary printing for ERROR STOP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57598 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 57598, which changed state. Bug 57598 Summary: [Coarray,caf] Add FPE summary printing for ERROR STOP https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57598 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/57598] [Coarray, caf] Add FPE summary printing for ERROR STOP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57598 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Andre Ve

[Bug fortran/57598] [Coarray, caf] Add FPE summary printing for ERROR STOP

||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/117347] Associate with derived type array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117347 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/117347] Associate with derived type array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117347 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from Andre V

[Bug fortran/117347] Associate with derived type array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117347 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Andre

[Bug fortran/100118] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE on sizeof with derived type components since r6-202-gf3b0bb7a560be0f0

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #9 from Andre Vehreschild --- Works for gfortran 15.0.0 at least for git-hash 27b444a41a6afab8020183c4c5d3361e21635031. The testprograms result is "STOP 8"

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >