http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55918
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Ringström 2013-01-09
17:39:20 UTC ---
Yes, I want 'bad_guy' to be in the backtrace, so you are correct that I don't
want the stack to be unwound at all, but unfortunately it is. It seems to be
because of the Foo objec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55917
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Ringström 2013-01-09
14:06:08 UTC ---
Yes, I thought two reports were in order, as they are only vaguely related. To
me, this one is the most important problem. I struggle to understand how I can
be the first to have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55918
Bug #: 55918
Summary: Stack partially unwound when noexcept causes call to
std::terminate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55917
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Ringström 2013-01-09
13:22:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29120
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29120
Test program to illustrate the problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55917
Bug #: 55917
Summary: Impossible to find/debug unhandled exceptions in an
std::thread
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCON
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tobias at ringis dot se
GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43908
ion: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tobias at ringis dot se
GCC build triplet: i586-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: i586-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: arm-
