https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112702
Bug ID: 112702
Summary: C23, C++23: Extended characters not valid in an
identifier with -pedantic
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
--- Comment #4 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
Bisected to f55cdce3f8dd8503e080e35be59c5f5390f6d95e
Attached preprocessed source and a creduced-reproducer of it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
--- Comment #3 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
Created attachment 56493
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56493&action=edit
Full preprocessor reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
--- Comment #2 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
Created attachment 56492
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56492&action=edit
creduced reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
Bug ID: 112337
Summary: arm: ICE in arm_effective_regno
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110255
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110255
Bug ID: 110255
Summary: arm: MVE intrinsics C++ polymorphism with
-flax-vector-conversions
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109697
Bug ID: 109697
Summary: arm: lack of MVE instruction costing causing worse
codegen on a vec_duplicate
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108177
--- Comment #5 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
With the fix to MVE auto_inc having gone in as
ddc9b5ee13cd686c8674f92d46045563c06a23ea I have found that this fix keeps the
auto-inc on these predicated stores broken.
It seems to fail in auto_inc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
--- Comment #3 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
Thank you, Andre for fixing the Part 1 in this ticket :)
The part 2 we've found to be a regression since r13-416-g485a0ae0982abe and is
also the reason why the mve_*_memory_nodes tests are currently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108443
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Bug ID: 109158
Summary: arm: errors when mixing
__attribute__((pcs("aapcs-vfp"))) with +nofp
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #9 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
> Clearly Helium+Linux on Godbolt is a bit confused
Yea, I agree -- it still shouldn't be an unintuitive front-end type clash
error, though!
I've posted another patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #7 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
(In reply to Kevin Bracey from comment #6)
> Retesting the Godbolt on trunk, it's now worse - every line produces
> multiple not-very-informative errors:
>
> source>:7:9: error: '_Generic' specifies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-11-17
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
Bug ID: 107674
Summary: [11/12/13 Regressions] arm: MVE codegen regressions on
VCTP and vector LDR/STR instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |stammark at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103247
Bug ID: 103247
Summary: graphite: Wrong code when at -O1 or higher and
-floop-nest-optimize is given without an earlier
tree-cunrolli pass
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |stammark at gcc dot
gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #8 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
I have a liiitle bit more progress here, but I have a question about
vect_get_smallest_scalar_type.
If we look at the comment before the function:
>/* Return the smallest scalar part of STMT_INFO.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #7 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #6)
> (In reply to Stam Markianos-Wright from comment #5)
> > I'm tempted to try and add a reverse:
> >
> > || multiple_p (*stmt_vectype_out, nunits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #5 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> (In reply to Stam Markianos-Wright from comment #3)
> > Just started looking at this. I've narrowed it as the bug appearing with
> > commit 9b75f56
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #3 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
Just started looking at this. I've narrowed it as the bug appearing with commit
9b75f56d4b7951c60a6563964a65787b95bc.
I have yet to fire this up in gdb to see what's happening, but one test I did
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91816
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
--- Comment #14 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
Was reminded that this was still open after many months. Have fixed the commit
and am in the process of backporting to gcc-8,9.(In reply to Stam
Markianos-Wright from comment #12)
> Was reminded that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|stammark at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64-linux-gnu
35 matches
Mail list logo