https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |stammark at gcc dot gnu.org CC| |stammark at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed| |2022-11-10 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Also confirmed on trunk and assigning to myself, because I believe I've found a fix: ``` diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h index 2d213e12304..ce20a6fcd24 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h @@ -35582,6 +35582,9 @@ enum { short: __ARM_mve_type_int_n, \ int: __ARM_mve_type_int_n, \ long: __ARM_mve_type_int_n, \ + _Float16: __ARM_mve_type_fp_n, \ + __fp16: __ARM_mve_type_fp_n, \ + float: __ARM_mve_type_fp_n, \ double: __ARM_mve_type_fp_n, \ long long: __ARM_mve_type_int_n, \ unsigned char: __ARM_mve_type_int_n, \ ``` Still untested, though, and I'll likely send it to the mailing list within the next week or two (we've got a couple more arm_mve.h changes in the pipeline, so I'll test them all together).