[Bug c/39031] HUGE_VAL_D32, HUGE_VAL_D64, HUGE_VAL_D128 missing from

2009-02-05 Thread rsa at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #5 from rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2009-02-05 19:32 --- >From the libdfp math.h: #if __STDC_WANT_DEC_FP__ # define DEC_INFINITY>---__builtin_infd32() # define DEC_NAN>>---(0.0DF * DEC_INFINITY) # define HUGE_VAL_D64>--__builtin_infd64() # defi

[Bug c/39031] HUGE_VAL_D32, HUGE_VAL_D64, HUGE_VAL_D128 missing from

2009-02-05 Thread rsa at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #4 from rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2009-02-05 19:28 --- This situation is a little bit muddy. The position of the GLIBC maintainer is that requirements of the DFP Technical Report will NEVER be added to GLIBC proper. There is indeed currently a EGLIBC branch that is hosting

[Bug c/35903] false warning when passing quoted string to function strcmp(arg,"no");

2008-04-10 Thread rsa at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #2 from rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2008-04-10 18:58 --- Compiled with: cd /home/ryanarn/glibc/stages/stage_lround/glibc/math /opt/at43/bin/gcc -m32 test-ildoubl.c -save-temps -c -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -g -mcpu

[Bug c/35903] false warning when passing quoted string to function strcmp(arg,"no");

2008-04-10 Thread rsa at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2008-04-10 18:57 --- Created an attachment (id=15465) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15465&action=view) preprocessed test-ildouble.c file. strcmp on line 16036 seems to be the problematic one. -- http://gcc.

[Bug c/35903] New: false warning when passing quoted string to function strcmp(arg,"no");

2008-04-10 Thread rsa at us dot ibm dot com
when passing quoted string to function strcmp(arg,"no"); Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org Re

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2006-06-02 Thread rsa at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #11 from rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2006-06-02 20:11 --- I recently ran into this on ppc/ppc64 when building a toolchain with gcc4.1 or gcc4.2. When the bootstrap gcc was built with --enable-checking=all (or =fold which we just tested) the glibc 32bit build stage fails in