------- Comment #11 from rsa at us dot ibm dot com 2006-06-02 20:11 -------
I recently ran into this on ppc/ppc64 when building a toolchain with gcc4.1 or
gcc4.2.
When the bootstrap gcc was built with --enable-checking=all (or =fold which we
just tested) the glibc 32bit build stage fails in vfprintf. Peter Bergner
extracted the minimal failure bit out here:
vfprintf.c
int main (void)
{
static void *array[] = { &&foo - &&bar };
return 0;
foo:
return 1;
bar:
return 2;
}
Compiler /home/user/gcc/gcc-4_1-20060601-2-biarch/bin/gcc compiled with
--enable-checking=all (=fold)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gcc/bugs/vfprintf>
/home/user/gcc/gcc-4_1-20060601-2-biarch/bin/gcc
-c vfprintf.c
vfprintf.c: In function main:
vfprintf.c:3: internal compiler error: fold check: original tree changed by
fold
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
--
rsa at us dot ibm dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsa at us dot ibm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623
