[Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 --- Comment #11 from Pierre Poissinger 2012-10-31 22:46:07 UTC --- Created attachment 28588 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28588 Don't treat missing headers as fatal error if only preproc Following patch allows prep

[Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 --- Comment #10 from Pierre Poissinger 2012-10-29 15:24:04 UTC --- No issues - made me smile :-) I know there are way around, just first tried the "upstream" path to see if there are any "quick" ways to ensure that we won't run into issu

[Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 --- Comment #8 from Pierre Poissinger 2012-10-29 15:03:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Or even better, use libClang to do > what you want instead of parsing GCC errors, which are likely to ch

[Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 --- Comment #7 from Pierre Poissinger 2012-10-29 14:59:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > That seems an odd way to generate missing declarations. Missing headers may > lead to different code being compiled because of undefined macros, f

[Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 Pierre Poissinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|I

[Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 --- Comment #3 from Pierre Poissinger 2012-10-29 14:42:09 UTC --- Hi, Typically: The header is used, and contains all the 'visible' functions found in source BUT it's only needed: a) To perform real compilation: To check that function c

[Bug preprocessor/55115] New: [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 Bug #: 55115 Summary: [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNC