http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115
--- Comment #7 from Pierre Poissinger <pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com> 2012-10-29 14:59:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > That seems an odd way to generate missing declarations. Missing headers may > lead to different code being compiled because of undefined macros, feature > test > macros, pragmas, etc. We don't compile... Prototyping only use the preproc result to retrieve function signatures. When compilation do occurs - headers have been generated and all is fine... > If the header is missing, then ignoring the error will produce exactly the > same > result as commenting out the #include. Yes - but that mean to hack around to bypass a "good" idea.. > Anyway, not a bug. That's why I say "regression" (it is) and "enhancement" :-)
