https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113779
--- Comment #5 from Miro Kropacek ---
I have been told that one of the reasons why post-incrementing modes are not
supported / preferred these days is that they halt the CPU pipeline (of course,
totally not applicable on m68k). So with the offse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113779
--- Comment #3 from Miro Kropacek ---
> I wonder if the code we emit is measurably slower though? It's possibly
a little bit larger due to the two IV increments.
It's definitely slower as both offsets next to the An registers generate a
separa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113779
Bug ID: 113779
Summary: Very inefficient m68k code generated for simple copy
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112712
Bug ID: 112712
Summary: Crash when compiling g++ -m68020-60 -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99690
Bug ID: 99690
Summary: gcc/config/m68k/t-mlibs doesn't allow extending
MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99144
Bug ID: 99144
Summary: -mtune=68040 doesn't respect restrictions set by
-march=68060
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal