[Bug target/44877] C++ compiler can no longer compile dealII for VSX/Altivec vectorization

2010-07-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #5 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2010-07-08 20:11 --- Subject: Re: C++ compiler can no longer compile dealII for VSX/Altivec vectorization On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:02:00PM -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Commen

[Bug debug/43478] Missing DW_AT_location for a variable

2010-05-05 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #13 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2010-05-05 23:30 --- Subject: Re: Missing DW_AT_location for a variable On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:40:00PM -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug rtl-optimization/43413] Powerpc generates worse code for -mvsx on gromacs even though there are no VSX instructions used

2010-03-22 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #8 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2010-03-22 22:29 --- Subject: Re: Powerpc generates worse code for -mvsx on gromacs even though there are no VSX instructions used On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:16:56PM -, vmakarov at redhat dot com wrote

[Bug rtl-optimization/43413] Powerpc generates worse code for -mvsx on gromacs even though there are no VSX instructions used

2010-03-22 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #7 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2010-03-22 22:24 --- Subject: Re: Powerpc generates worse code for -mvsx on gromacs even though there are no VSX instructions used On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:20:21PM -, vmakarov at redhat dot com wrote

[Bug middle-end/42431] [4.5 Regression] wrong code for 200.sixtrack with vectorization and -fdata-sections

2010-02-24 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #10 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2010-02-24 21:01 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] wrong code for 200.sixtrack with vectorization and -fdata-sections On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:57:17PM -, bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote

[Bug tree-optimization/42286] October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math

2010-01-05 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #11 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2010-01-05 18:40 --- Subject: Re: October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:03:17PM -, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > > > --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/42286] October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math

2009-12-07 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #4 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-12-07 18:37 --- Subject: Re: October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:25:15PM -, irar at il dot ibm dot com wrote: > > > --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/42286] October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math

2009-12-04 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #2 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-12-04 21:28 --- Subject: Re: October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:18:45PM -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --

[Bug bootstrap/40597] Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c

2009-07-23 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #35 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-07-23 23:00 --- Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:52:01PM -, paolo dot bonzini at gmail dot com wrote: > > > --- Comment #34 from

[Bug target/30210] [4.5 Regression] Altivec builtins have inaccurate return types

2009-07-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #17 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-07-08 23:42 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Altivec builtins have inaccurate return types On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:04:03PM -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #16 from r

[Bug bootstrap/40597] Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c

2009-06-29 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #5 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-06-30 04:20 --- Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:32:47PM -, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from bonzini a

[Bug bootstrap/40597] Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c

2009-06-29 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #4 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-06-29 21:46 --- Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:34:02PM -, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot

[Bug bootstrap/40221] New: Powerpc bootstrap is broken in building libstdc++

2009-05-21 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
t gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40221

[Bug tree-optimization/40219] iterative_hash_expr in tree.c has an out of bound reference for machine specific builtins

2009-05-21 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-21 13:14 --- Created an attachment (id=17898) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17898&action=view) Patch to avoid de-referencing outside array bounds This patch fixes the particular proble

[Bug tree-optimization/40219] New: iterative_hash_expr in tree.c has an out of bound reference for machine specific builtins

2009-05-21 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug target/40197] Spu fortran does not build

2009-05-19 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-19 12:35 --- Created an attachment (id=17892) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17892&action=view) Define PTRDIFF_TYPE, SIZE_TYPE. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40197

[Bug target/40197] New: Spu fortran does not build

2009-05-19 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64

[Bug c/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap

2009-05-18 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #23 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-19 02:33 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:38:08AM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: > > > --- Comment #22 from hjl dot tools

[Bug c/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap

2009-05-18 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #20 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-18 23:48 --- David, as I said in my message, this patch is just papering over the problem. While we might want to install this patch temporarily, to get the mips and rs6000 building again, I think a better

[Bug c/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap

2009-05-18 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #16 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-18 22:56 --- Just to chime in, the warning is a useful warning, but the way rs6000 and mips define FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD, the test in toplev.c will never succeed. I can see a couple of ways to fix this: 1) Revert

[Bug bootstrap/40118] cond-optab breaks powerpc bootstrap

2009-05-12 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #2 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-12 12:54 --- Created an attachment (id=17854) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17854&action=view) Patch to fix bootstrap error message. Patch applied to the tree as obvious. --

[Bug bootstrap/40118] New: cond-optab breaks powerpc bootstrap

2009-05-12 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64

[Bug bootstrap/40082] [4.5 Regression] Power bootstrap is broken in building libstdc++

2009-05-09 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #6 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-10 01:05 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Power bootstrap is broken in building libstdc++ On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:44:29PM -, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > > > --- Comment #3 from hubicka a

[Bug bootstrap/40082] [4.5 Regression] Power bootstrap is broken in building libstdc++

2009-05-09 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #4 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-09 15:56 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Power bootstrap is broken in building libstdc++ On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:44:29PM -, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > > > --- Comment #3 from hubicka a

[Bug bootstrap/40082] Power bootstrap is broken in building libstdc++

2009-05-09 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-09 12:36 --- Created an attachment (id=17836) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17836&action=view) .ii file of file in libstdc++ that causes the failure The options needed to show this

[Bug bootstrap/40082] New: Power bootstrap is broken in building libstdc++

2009-05-09 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
rity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40082

[Bug tree-optimization/40073] Vector short/char shifts generate sub-optimal code

2009-05-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-08 16:59 --- Created an attachment (id=17827) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17827&action=view) test case This code is an example of the code that generates sub-optimal code. --

[Bug tree-optimization/40073] Vector short/char shifts generate sub-optimal code

2009-05-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #5 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-08 17:06 --- Created an attachment (id=17831) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17831&action=view) Vectorizer verbose output This is the output from the Powerpc compiler with -fdump-tr

[Bug tree-optimization/40073] Vector short/char shifts generate sub-optimal code

2009-05-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #4 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-08 17:04 --- Created an attachment (id=17830) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17830&action=view) X86_64 example code This code was compiled with an x86_64 compiler with the -O3 -msse3

[Bug tree-optimization/40073] Vector short/char shifts generate sub-optimal code

2009-05-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #3 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-08 17:03 --- Created an attachment (id=17829) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17829&action=view) Powerpc example code This code was compiled with -O3 -maltivec. -- http://gcc.

[Bug tree-optimization/40073] Vector short/char shifts generate sub-optimal code

2009-05-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #2 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-08 17:02 --- Created an attachment (id=17828) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17828&action=view) Replacement test case that doesn't need -DTYPE to show the bug Replaceme

[Bug tree-optimization/40073] New: Vector short/char shifts generate sub-optimal code

2009-05-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
shifts generate sub-optimal code Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet

[Bug tree-optimization/40049] Incorrect tree made for vector shifted by constant on powerpc, spu

2009-05-07 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #9 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-07 21:33 --- Created an attachment (id=17824) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17824&action=view) Updated patch that fixes some internal compiler errors I discovered in further testin

[Bug tree-optimization/40049] Incorrect tree made for vector shifted by constant on powerpc, spu

2009-05-06 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #6 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-06 20:00 --- Created an attachment (id=17813) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17813&action=view) More targetted patch to fix the problem This patch is much more targeted to just make sure

[Bug tree-optimization/40049] Incorrect tree made for vector shifted by constant on powerpc, spu

2009-05-06 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #5 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-06 19:35 --- Subject: Re: Incorrect tree made for vector shifted by constant on powerpc, spu On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 07:22:25PM -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/40049] Incorrect tree made for vector shifted by constant on powerpc, spu

2009-05-06 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #2 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-06 19:19 --- Created an attachment (id=17812) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17812&action=view) Simplified test case This testcase shows the problem. Without the patch, it generates a

[Bug tree-optimization/40049] Incorrect tree made for vector shifted by constant on powerpc, spu

2009-05-06 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-06 19:08 --- Created an attachment (id=17811) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17811&action=view) Patch to fix vector shift by constant on machines with vector/vector shift This patch fi

[Bug tree-optimization/40049] New: Incorrect tree made for vector shifted by constant on powerpc, spu

2009-05-06 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
iority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown

[Bug testsuite/39769] vmx tests fail due to reliance on floating point equality

2009-04-14 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-04-14 17:48 --- Created an attachment (id=17637) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17637&action=view) Patch to fix the tests not to use floating point equality. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug testsuite/39769] New: vmx tests fail due to reliance on floating point equality

2009-04-14 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug target/39558] Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support

2009-03-27 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #9 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-03-27 21:20 --- Subject: Re: Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 05:55:05PM -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comme

[Bug target/39558] Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support

2009-03-27 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #7 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-03-27 15:59 --- Subject: Re: Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:18:52AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > Note, there is problem with infin

[Bug target/39558] Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support

2009-03-27 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #6 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-03-27 15:19 --- Subject: Re: Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:09:57AM -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comme

[Bug target/39558] Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support

2009-03-26 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #4 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-03-26 15:43 --- Further testing shows that this only happens if you use the -save-temps option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39558

[Bug target/39558] Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support

2009-03-26 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #3 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-03-26 15:24 --- Subject: Re: Bad interaction of decls named 'vector' and -maltivec vector support On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:00:49PM -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comme

[Bug target/39558] Fortran iresolve.c cannot be built with -maltivec used in bootstrap

2009-03-25 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #1 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-03-25 23:24 --- Created an attachment (id=17543) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17543&action=view) Simplified test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39558

[Bug target/39558] New: Fortran iresolve.c cannot be built with -maltivec used in bootstrap

2009-03-25 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target

[Bug driver/39293] -save-temps does not follow the -o option and instead puts the temp file in the current directory

2009-02-27 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #3 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-02-28 01:01 --- Created an attachment (id=17374) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17374&action=view) This patch fixes -save-temps so that it puts the temp file in the output directory rather t

[Bug driver/39293] New: -save-temps does not follow the -o option and instead puts the temp file in the current directory

2009-02-24 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
t org ReportedBy: meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39293