------- Comment #5 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-06-30
04:20 -------
Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to
changes in expmed.c
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:32:47PM -0000, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-06-29 21:32 -------
> Mine of course. I was going to post the patch to the mailing list after it
> was
> well into my x86_64-linux bootstrap, I'll add it here.
>
> Thanks for the testcase BTW.
>
>
> --
>
> bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
> |dot org |
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
> Ever Confirmed|0 |1
> Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-06-29 21:32:47
> date| |
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40597
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
With my patch, I get 4 regressions compared to the sources I snapped on Friday
(subversion #148954):
gcc.c-torture/execute/20071030-1.c
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37258.c
gfortran.dg/negative_unit_int8.f
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/inquire_5.f90
On the other hand, I get one pass that used to fail:
gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40597
