https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #2 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net ---
Shouldn't the status be confirmed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78882
--- Comment #1 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net ---
Flags are -std=c++14 and the actual problem seems to be templates combined with
auto:
#include
struct In {
};
template
auto anonymousWrap() {
return T();
};
int main() {
using namespace
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lcid-fire at gmx dot net
Target Milestone: ---
The following does not compile on GCC up to 7 while working fine in clang and
icc:
#include
#include
struct Bar {
template
T* bar(const char*) {
return nullptr
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lcid-fire at gmx dot net
The code in
https://github.com/RobertBeckebans/RBDOOM-3-BFG/blob/dd9b8a8710dd7f8c1376eb245ee31fc740eae6eb/neo/renderer/tr_backend_rendertools.cpp
triggers a false positive maybe-uninitialized warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292
--- Comment #4 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net 2013-02-12 15:23:58 UTC ---
constexpr std::uint8_t value = func() + 2;
does generate the same warning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292
--- Comment #2 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net 2013-02-12 10:13:17 UTC ---
But should it be evaluated before constexpr are processed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292
Bug #: 56292
Summary: False positive for constexpr arithmetics
(-Wconversion)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50244
--- Comment #5 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net 2011-09-02 06:41:29 UTC ---
It seems to be a mixup of gcc 4.4.3 and 4.5.3 include paths. Obviously the
headers are quite different - I'll have to sort it out.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50244
--- Comment #3 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net 2011-08-30 23:14:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 25142
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25142
Generated ii file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50244
--- Comment #2 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net 2011-08-30 23:13:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 25141
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25141
Filtered output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50244
Bug #: 50244
Summary: wcstold not available for C++0x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50140
Bug #: 50140
Summary: sorry, unimplemented: cannot expand ‘T ...’ into a
fixed-length argument list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: U
12 matches
Mail list logo
