http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292
--- Comment #2 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net 2013-02-12 10:13:17 UTC --- But should it be evaluated before constexpr are processed?
- [Bug c++/56292] New: False positive for constex... lcid-fire at gmx dot net
- [Bug c++/56292] False positive for constex... jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/56292] False positive for constex... lcid-fire at gmx dot net
- [Bug c++/56292] False positive for constex... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/56292] False positive for constex... lcid-fire at gmx dot net
