http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58437
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey M. Birnbaum ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #19)
> I ran some quick tests and indeed the performance seems equal of better of
> those of the old C++03 code. Note that the patch is very small and can be
> in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58437
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey M. Birnbaum ---
Tammy,
We tested gcc 4.7.2, 4.6.2 and 4.4.3/5 (the bug is not in either 4.4.3/5). I
have gcc 4.8.1 on my laptop but have not tried it yet. I confirmed the issue by
compiling my test (almost identical t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58437
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey M. Birnbaum ---
Tammy,
Something must have been in the air because your timestamp on the bug
submission means that right at the time you were reporting the bug I was
actively looking into why I was seeing horrible sor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58440
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey M. Birnbaum ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
> Dup.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58437 ***
Cool, I actually did a search before submitting the bug but I did not find
anything a
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jmbnyc at gmail dot com
Created attachment 30828
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30828&action=edit
cpp file the illustrates bug
The attached
--- Comment #11 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 20:57 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
Thanks for looking at it. Uli Drepper helped me to look at the asm and
conclude (just about one hour ago) that indeed the problem is with
&qu
--- Comment #9 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:51 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
Fair enough. I did report it to them, but never heard back. Uli
Drepper is going to try to help me get to the right people. He has
also offered to
--- Comment #8 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:48 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
One last comment. From the below, I think it is clear that the
compiler is the problem. If I compile with -g then I get the problem,
however
--- Comment #6 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:41 ---
This bug might be a duplicate as you suggest but (my fault for opening new
instead of updating original) it is not 'resolved'. On the original post you
said to report to binutils because you suggested the bug
--- Comment #5 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:27 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
Look, I am not trying to be a jerk, but this new filing has a test
case associated with it (another thing that you asked for). In
addition, I took
--- Comment #4 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:23 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Didn't I already tell you to post this to binutils?
>
yes you did and I did what you asked. However, I now believe that the problem
is with the compiler. I also came up with a tes
--- Comment #1 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=12385)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12385&action=view)
gzip'd tar file with README that shows how to reproduce
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29359
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jmbnyc at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: gcc version 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1)
GCC host triplet: Redhat FC5: 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
GCC target triplet:
--- Comment #2 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-26 20:58 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name
As I suggested in my post, I am fully updated as of one hour ago. I
reported the problem to redhat last week and never received a
response. Do you have any idea what
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jmbnyc at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: gcc version 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1)
GCC host triplet: linux fc5 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
GCC target triplet: x86-64 and i
--- Comment #3 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-18 17:58 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name
FYI:
I think I found the source of the problem. I am using boost::bind to
create a function pointer to an object. If my class does not have a
default constructor then I get the
--- Comment #2 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-18 17:24 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name
thanks, will do.
/JMB
On 18 Sep 2006 17:23:33 -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gn
tatus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jmbnyc at gmail dot com
GCC host triplet: linux fc5 x86-64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29130
--- Comment #7 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-08-24 16:47 ---
Subject: Re: gcc -g and shared objects
I finally updated my system today. I now have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] BUtil]$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 8
16:00:39 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386
--- Comment #6 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-08-16 03:20 ---
Subject: Re: gcc -g and shared objects
Ok, I will update the system when I have a chance.
I had looked at the .s and I did not see anything unusual.
What do you mean by "memory problems"?
/JMB
On 16 Aug 200
--- Comment #4 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-08-16 02:48 ---
Subject: Re: gcc -g and shared objects
Just because it works for you does not mean it is not a problem. I am
not an idiot (and I am not saying that you implied that I was) and I
believe there is a problem. I believe the
--- Comment #3 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-08-16 02:42 ---
Subject: Re: gcc -g and shared objects
Very bizarre. I struggled with this all of last night and most of
today. It is very bizarre. I am running stock RH FC5 that I installed
about 4 weeks ago. I even tried -g -O and it
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jmbnyc at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28746
23 matches
Mail list logo
