------- Comment #6 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-08-16 03:20 ------- Subject: Re: gcc -g and shared objects
Ok, I will update the system when I have a chance. I had looked at the .s and I did not see anything unusual. What do you mean by "memory problems"? /JMB On 16 Aug 2006 02:55:58 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 02:55 > ------- > (In reply to comment #4) > > Subject: Re: gcc -g and shared objects > > > > Just because it works for you does not mean it is not a problem. I am > > not an idiot (and I am not saying that you implied that I was) and I > > believe there is a problem. I believe the problem is not in ld, but in > > the aspect of gcc that produces -g output. > > Use -save-temps and look at the output of the .s file, there is nothing > unusual > about it. Also binutils includes as which is what converts the .s file into > the .o file. > > > Perhaps I have something > > screwed up with my system, but it is an unpatched default install of > > RH FC5. I tried a regular c file and it worked fine with -g. So, it is > > something with C++ compilation using -g. > > And I am using a default install of FC5 too, though updated. Also so many > other people use FC5 without this issue too. > > Anyways I think you should try to update FC5 and then if does not work, try > seeing if you are having memory issues. > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28746 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28746
