[Bug tree-optimization/34563] noinline function call being removed

2008-01-18 Thread jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #12 from jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com 2008-01-18 22:20 --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > Since this topic came up, I've seen various suggestions for how to > > > guarantee > > that a function gets inlined --

[Bug tree-optimization/34563] noinline function call being removed

2008-01-17 Thread jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #9 from jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com 2008-01-17 18:52 --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Testing of stuff like kprobes in Linux would be a lot easier if nolinline > > worked reliably. See this thread, for example: > > http

[Bug tree-optimization/34563] noinline function call being removed

2008-01-09 Thread jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #7 from jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com 2008-01-09 22:35 --- Testing of stuff like kprobes in Linux would be a lot easier if nolinline worked reliably. See this thread, for example: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119991179332571&w=2 BTW, this sort of noinline