------- Comment #12 from jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com 2008-01-18 22:20 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > Since this topic came up, I've seen various suggestions for how to > > > guarantee > > that a function gets inlined -- e.g., make it a varargs function, or > > include an > > empty asm statement. > > I assume you're referring to the thread at > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-01/msg00165.html>? If it's elsewhere, I > wouldn't count on it.
The varargs idea came from the Linux Kernel Mailing List thread I noted in Comment #7. The asm idea came from the gcc thread you started -- thanks. Plainly, once gcc folks settle on the One Correct Incantation, we'll use that. (And we can throw out all the other inline-thwarting kludges if that incantation happens to work for older gcc versions as well... but that's not your problem.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34563
