[Bug middle-end/117208] Miscompilation at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208 --- Comment #6 from Jiajing_Zheng --- I see. Thanks.

[Bug middle-end/117208] New: Miscompilation at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208 Bug ID: 117208 Summary: Miscompilation at -O0 Product: gcc Version: 11.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Ass

[Bug middle-end/113709] New: User -fno-thread-jumps gave Floating point exception at -O2, -O3, -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113709 Bug ID: 113709 Summary: User -fno-thread-jumps gave Floating point exception at -O2, -O3, -Os Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/113702] -fsanitize=undefined missed a check under GCC 12.2.0 compared to 13.2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113702 --- Comment #1 from Jiajing_Zheng --- jing@jing-ubuntu:~$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/jing/gcc-12.2.0/usr/local/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.2.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Conf

[Bug c/113702] New: -fsanitize=undefined missed a check under GCC 12.2.0 compared to 13.2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113702 Bug ID: 113702 Summary: -fsanitize=undefined missed a check under GCC 12.2.0 compared to 13.2.0 Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug middle-end/113669] -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113669 --- Comment #3 from Jiajing_Zheng --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > This is because already the FE optimizes it, when it sees that > ((int)(g_B * g_A[1])) & (g_A[1] & g_A[0]) | g_A[0] > is just being added to unsigned char elemen

[Bug sanitizer/113669] New: -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113669 Bug ID: 113669 Summary: -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/113628] -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113628 --- Comment #2 from Jiajing_Zheng --- (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #1) > These two files are not equivalent. The equivalent would be > long TVH = (g_106 / (g_51 ? g_51 : 16653417461)); > because that is the type that subexpression

[Bug sanitizer/113628] New: -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113628 Bug ID: 113628 Summary: -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/113482] New: Sanitizer configuration error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113482 Bug ID: 113482 Summary: Sanitizer configuration error Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug c/113479] New: Two equivalent programs have inconsistent output results at the same optimization level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113479 Bug ID: 113479 Summary: Two equivalent programs have inconsistent output results at the same optimization level Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED