--- Comment #9 from jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com
2006-09-17 15:14 ---
Subject: RE: compiler generates incorrect ARM instructions when using long
bitfields
Surely that's the definition of a bug?
I've heard of "If it ain't broke, don't fix
--- Comment #7 from jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com
2006-09-17 08:47 ---
Subject: RE: compiler generates incorrect ARM instructions when using long
bitfields
Why not? What are the criteria? It is obviously wrong and would be so
simple to fix, even optionally with a
--- Comment #5 from jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com
2006-08-02 12:56 ---
The problem is that I am porting code from the IAR systems compiler that makes
large use of bitfields to access registers. Obviously it handles bitfields
correctly. And I don't particularly
--- Comment #11 from jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com
2006-08-02 11:30 ---
*** Bug 28568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com
2006-08-02 11:30 ---
Indeed it is.
I didn't mean to post this and was still researching the problem when I
accidently posted it. I found PR23623 shortly afterwards.
What is the status of PR23624. I see there
: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com
GCC target triplet: arm-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28568
