------- Comment #7 from jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com 2006-09-17 08:47 ------- Subject: RE: compiler generates incorrect ARM instructions when using long bitfields
Why not? What are the criteria? It is obviously wrong and would be so simple to fix, even optionally with a runtime option. -----Original Message----- From: rearnsha at arm dot com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2006 13:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug c/28568] compiler generates incorrect ARM instructions when using long bitfields ------- Comment #6 from rearnsha at arm dot com 2006-09-11 12:14 ------- Subject: Re: compiler generates incorrect ARM instructions when using long bitfields On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 13:56, jason dot morgan at vpnsolutions dot uk dot com wrote: > Where do I obtain EABI and what effect will it have on my toolchain? http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/ABI.html > Is there any plan or project to merge the resolution to PR23623 back into gcc > 4.1.1 No, this doesn't fit the critera for a regression, so it won't be fixed in FSF releases. However, I think the CodeSourcery distributions have this feature in a 4.1 build. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28568 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28568
