https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180
--- Comment #5 from Jan Čapek ---
(In reply to DJ Delorie from comment #4)
> Perhaps you need this patch:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00993.html
DJ Delorie,
you are the man! The patch works as expected. Interestingly, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180
--- Comment #3 from Jan Čapek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> C11 says something different here.
I can see the following the -fstrict-volatile-bitfields documentation:
"This option should be used if accesses to volatile bit-fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180
--- Comment #2 from Jan Čapek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> C11 says something different here.
Can you be a bit more specific?
: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jan.capek at braiins dot cz
Created attachment 33359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachmen
