[Bug bootstrap/44959] New: [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

2010-07-15 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC host triplet: alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959

[Bug libgcj/40947] Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after -_SYSTYPE_SVR4

2010-07-15 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #3 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-07-15 21:29 --- Adding a few releases I have tried (4.3.4, 4.3.5, 4.4.4 and 4.5.0 all failed), and 4.4.1 worked. I can try 4.4.2 and 4.4.3 as well if somebody insists. -- htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net changed

[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision

2010-07-14 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #7 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-07-14 14:44 --- 4.4.4 (built with 4.3.3) fails at stage 3 and 4 comparison. Comparing stages 3 and 4 Bootstrap comparison failure! ./crtfastmath.o differs make[2]: *** [compare3] Error 1 objdump -Dxzs stage3-gcc

[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision

2010-07-14 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #6 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-07-14 14:25 --- 4.3.5 also bootstrap4-lean alright (hit bug 40947 later with libjava). -- htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/40947] Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after -_SYSTYPE_SVR4

2010-07-14 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-07-14 10:05 --- This seems to have become an regression - it worked in 4.3.3 and failed in 4.3.5 . -- htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4/4.5 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision

2009-09-24 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #5 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-25 04:40 --- latest run was with svn-r152154 . also filed new bug 41465 , I just noticed I wrote 'bootstrap-lean' in comment 2 instead of 'bootstrap4-lean' - it is probably not important in light of

[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4/4.5 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision

2009-09-24 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #4 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-25 04:33 --- situation gone worse: make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/ob-dir' Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/c

[Bug bootstrap/41465] bootstrap failed - ../libdecnumber/gstdint.h:80: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers

2009-09-24 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-24 23:56 --- (In reply to comment #1) > int64_t and uint64_t are both already defined in /usr/include/inttypes.h - > it appears that intmax_t and uintmax_t may also be defined elsewhere as well, > although I

[Bug bootstrap/41465] bootstrap failed - ../libdecnumber/gstdint.h:80: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers

2009-09-24 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #1 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-24 23:51 --- int64_t and uint64_t are both already defined in /usr/include/inttypes.h - it appears that intmax_t and uintmax_t may also be defined elsewhere as well, although I couldn't locate it. --

[Bug bootstrap/41465] New: bootstrap failed - ../libdecnumber/gstdint.h:80: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers

2009-09-24 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC host triplet: alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41465

[Bug libgcj/40947] Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after -_SYSTYPE_SVR4

2009-08-03 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #1 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-08-03 08:57 --- This is just from ../src/configure ; make . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947

[Bug libgcj/40947] New: Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after -_SYSTYPE_SVR4

2009-08-03 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
ReportedBy: htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC host triplet: alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947

[Bug libstdc++/40912] [4.5 Regression] failure to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-08-02 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #19 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-08-02 22:51 --- The libltdl issue is a ksh bug... setting CONFIG_SHELL works around it. (The person running ../src/configure has $SHELL=bash and I don't know why it wasn't inherited...) http://www.mail-archive.c

[Bug libstdc++/40912] [4.5 Regression] failure to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-08-02 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #18 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-08-02 22:33 --- Tried svn r150353 (today) and the precompiled problem is gone and it fails at the same place as before the precompiled header change - as in gcc-4.5-20090402 (svn r145482) mentioned in comment 11

[Bug libstdc++/40912] [4.5 Regression] failure to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-31 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #15 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-31 09:55 --- (In reply to comment #14) > Note, in the meanwhile, if you want to build to test other parts of the C++ > library, other things, whatever, you can always pass --disable-libstdcxx-pch Thanks for th

[Bug libstdc++/40912] 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #12 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-31 02:14 --- (In reply to comment #10) It looks like 4.5 will be dead-on-arrival alpha*-dec-osf[45]*, unless I fix this myself... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912

[Bug libstdc++/40912] 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #11 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-31 01:50 --- gcc-4.5-20090409 (svn r145863) breaks at the same place; gcc-4.5-20090402 (svn r145482) breaks later at - make all-am make[4]: Entering directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/45b/alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a

[Bug libstdc++/40912] 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #9 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30 16:54 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Do you want something to click? PR448 Oh, I didn't expect bug id that old to be relevant - I thought c/448 might be short for bug XX448 so I tried bug 40448 :-). (In

[Bug libstdc++/40912] 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #6 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30 15:58 --- (In reply to comment #5) > As a side note, I want to mention that we are very close to finally fixing > c/448 for 4.5.0. Then, any problem related to will disappear. What is 'c/448'? I hav

[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #3 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30 13:01 --- FYI, the libstdc++v3 issue with gcc 4.5 is filed as bug 40912 . So gcc 4.4/4.5 support are both a bit broken, just differently. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40894

[Bug libstdc++/40912] 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #4 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30 12:57 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Well, the file itself didn't *exist* in 4.3.x and 4.4.x... Oh, indeed... have been trying to build subversion for the last few hours just so that I can try last night&#

[Bug libstdc++/40912] 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30 11:49 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why don't you just use SVN? Also, is this failure new, or not? As far as I > know > could even be months old... I am digging a hole for myself here - am currentl

[Bug libstdc++/40912] New: 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
subscript make[4]: *** [alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a/bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/obj45-dir/alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a/libstdc++-v3/include' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/obj45-dir/alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a/libstdc++-v3' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/obj45-dir/alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a/libstdc++-v3' make[1]: *** [all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/obj45-dir' make: *** [bootstrap4-lean] Error 2 --- -- Summary: 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC host triplet: alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912

[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision

2009-07-30 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30 09:52 --- (In reply to comment #1) > There is no indication in this bug report of whether the issue also > appears for 4.5. If it does, please update the regression marker to > "4.4/4.5 Regression&qu

[Bug middle-end/21953] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

2009-07-28 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #12 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-28 22:49 --- Still broken with 4.3.1, with alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-08/msg02507.html Am about to submit the testsuite result for 4.3.3 and 4.4.1, and I think the result is

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4/4.5 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2009-07-28 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #10 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-28 20:42 --- The 'find bad option' problem was already reported for solaris as bug 38715 . just FYI. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4/4.5 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2009-07-28 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #9 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-28 20:30 --- Sorry for the noise - the 'find: bad option -path' error message of mine is genuine - gcc 4.4 (classpath) requires GNU findutils syntax which doesn't work with DEC/Tru64 find. Am filing a s

[Bug bootstrap/40894] New: [4.4 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision

2009-07-28 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
comparision Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4/4.5 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2009-07-28 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #8 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-28 18:06 --- I have a slightly different message on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a with gcc 4.4.1, but possibly the same problem: (I can bootstrap 4.3.3, but no luck with 4.4.0/4.4.1): find

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4/4.5 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2009-07-28 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #7 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-28 17:53 --- I probably have a similiar bug about length of commend line with 4.4.1 which I shall file now. -- htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/37244] libstdc++ fails to build

2008-08-26 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #5 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-08-26 18:19 --- (In reply to comment #4) > From that link: > GNU tar version 1.14 (or later) > Necessary (only on some platforms) to untar the source code. Many systems' tar > programs will also work, on

[Bug libstdc++/37244] libstdc++ fails to build

2008-08-26 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #3 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-08-26 18:06 --- Yes, mid-air collision - I realised the problem as soon as I looked at my own bug report and looked at the directory again. Still, the POSIX tar vs GNU tar issue could be spelt out a bit :-(. (spent a few

[Bug libstdc++/37244] libstdc++ fails to build

2008-08-26 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-08-26 18:04 --- Oh dear, sorry about the noise - Looking at my own error message about the missing files and where they are, I found that it is the vendor tar which is broken - it truncates file path names to 100

[Bug libstdc++/37244] New: libstdc++ fails to build

2008-08-26 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
mmary: libstdc++ fails to build Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot n

[Bug target/15065] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] bootstrap fails during bulding libstdc++-v3 on Tru64 V5.0

2008-08-25 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #17 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-08-25 08:07 --- Am having problem with libstdc++-v3 during bootrap of gcc 4.3.1 on Tru64 V5.1. gfortran and gcc built fine. (with --enable-languages=c,fortran to override the default list of c,c++,fortran,objc). The last

[Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"

2005-04-25 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-04-26 03:18 --- on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1, the make[3]: execvp: /bin/sh: Arg list too long make[3]: *** [libgcj0_convenience.la] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/gcc-4.x-build-dir/alphaev68-dec

[Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"

2005-04-25 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-04-26 02:43 --- had the same problem with alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 as well. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/21225] New: gnu/xml/dom/DomDOMException.java:171: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2005-04-25 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net
error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot n