------- Comment #9 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30 16:54 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Do you want something to click? PR448
Oh, I didn't expect bug id that old to be relevant - I thought c/448 might be short for bug XX448 so I tried bug 40448 :-). (In reply to comment #8) > Subject: Re: 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile > bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > > > As a side note, I want to mention that we are very close to finally fixing > > c/448 for 4.5.0. Then, any problem related to <stdint.h> will disappear. > > We're still quite some way from that; I just sent a list of 14 target OSes > that either need stdint.h information entered in GCC, or need to be > deprecated. (This is down from 20 at the start of April: information has > been added since then for Darwin, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Cygwin, MinGW and AIX.) > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-07/msg00625.html > I can't say about the others alpha*-dec-osf[45]*, but I can certainly give you alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a . How do you like this info? If you have a list to hunt for, or even a small test program which includes the various headers and print the numbers, I can do that... See as I seem to be the only one submitting testsuite results for alpha*-dec-osf[45]* beyond 4.1-ish, what is the qualification/requirement for OS porter/maintainer to take it off the deprecated list? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912
